India inDetails

Anthropocentrism is the privileging of humans as "subjects" over nonhuman as "objects". Architecture is frequently perceived as spaces to be occupied by humans. Can we not observe architecture as autonomous objects? Independent from history, humans, purpose, and service? Can we not conceive architecture as objects placed in larger objects –cities, lands, earth, …-, yet formed by smaller ones? In this collection, correlations of these objects are demonstrated. The correlation of the objects and the sky -also an object- and the correlation between objects themselves. At this point, it becomes possible to have a collection of details in the architectures that come from a variety of eras with different styles, forms, and colors, yet preserving a profound coherency. A collection that is not expected to be captured in India with its maximalist architectures with high detailed ornaments. Does the collection of these objects still bring into mind a larger object? India?